Toxic iron species in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients : course of disease and effects on outcome

Item does not contain fulltex

Simulated-Physiological Loading Conditions Preserve Biological and Mechanical Properties of Caprine Lumbar Intervertebral Discs in Ex Vivo Culture

Low-back pain (LBP) is a common medical complaint and associated with high societal costs. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD) is assumed to be an important causal factor of LBP. IVDs are continuously mechanically loaded and both positive and negative effects have been attributed to different loading conditions

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

In search of a putative long-lived relaxed radical pair state in closed photosystem II: Kinetic modeling of picosecond fluorescence data

The concept of a relaxed radical pair state in closed photosystem (PS) II centers (first quinone acceptor reduced) is critically examined on the basis of chlorophyll fluorescence decay data of the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Global analysis resulting in the decay-associated fluorescence spectra from closed PS II centers reveals a new PS II lifetime component (τ ≈ 380 ps) in addition to two PS II components (τ ∼ 1.3 and 2.1 ns) resolved earlier. Particular emphasis was given to resolve a potential long-lived (∼ 10 ns) component of small amplitude; however, the longest lifetime found is only 2.1 ns. From comparison of experimental and simulated data we conclude that the maximum relative amplitude of such a potential long-lived component must be <0.1%. The PS II kinetics are analyzed in terms of a three-state model involving an antenna/reaction center excited state, a primary radical pair state, and a relaxed radical pair state. The rate constants for charge separation and presumed radical pair relaxation as well as those for the reverse processes are calculated. Critical examination of these results leads us to exclude the formation with high yield (> 15%) of a long-lived (τ ≥ 3 ns) relaxed radical pair in closed PS II. If at all distinguishable kinetically and energetically from the primary radical pair, a relaxed radical pair would not live longer than 2-3 ns in green algae. The data suggest, however, that the concept of a long-lived relaxed radical pair state is inappropriate for intact PS II

Global target analysis of picosecond chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics from pea chloroplasts: A new approach to the characterization of the primary processes in photosystem II α- and β-units

In this study, we have used the method of target analysis to analyze the ps fluorescence kinetics of pea chloroplasts with open (F(0)) and closed (F(max)) photosystem II (PS II) centers. Extending the exciton/radical pair equilibrium model (Schatz, G. H., H. Brock, and A. R. Holzwarth. 1988. Biophys. J. 54:397-405) to allow for PS II heterogeneity, we show that two types of PS II (labeled α and β) must be accounted for, each pool being characterized by its own set of molecular rate constants within the model. Simultaneous global target analysis of the data at F(0) and F(max) results in a detailed description of the molecular kinetics and energetics of the primary processes in both types of PS II units. This characterization revealed that the PS IIα pool accounts for twice as many Chl molecules as PS IIβ, which suggests a PSIIα/PSIIβ reaction center stoichiometry of close to unity. By extrapolation it is shown that the primary charge separation in hypothetical “isolated” β reaction centers is slower than in isolated α reaction centers: in open centers by a factor of 4 (1/k(1)(int) = 11 vs 2.9 ps), in closed centers by a factor of 2 (1/k(1)(int) = 34 vs 19 ps). Despite this slower charge separation process in PS IIβ, the quantum efficiency of the charge separation process is hardly affected: a charge stabilization yield at F(0), (i.e., P(+)IQ(A)(-)) of 86% (as compared to 90% in PS IIα). Reduction of Q(A) (closing PS II) has distinctly different effects on the primary kinetics of PS IIβ, as compared to PS IIα. In PS IIα the charge separation rate drops by a factor of 6, whereas the charge recombination process is hardly affected. In PS IIβ the charge separation is slowed down by a factor of 3, whereas the charge recombination rate increases by a factor of 5. In terms of changes in standard free energy, the reduction to Q(A)(-) lifts the free energy of the radical pair P(+)I(-), relative to the excited state (Chl(n)/P)(*), by 47 meV in PS IIα and by 67 meV in PS IIβ. The concomitant increase in fluorescence quantum yield is the same for both types of PS II. These results show that PS IIα and PS IIβ exhibit a different molecular functioning with respect to the primary processes, which might have its origin in a different molecular structure of the reaction centers and/or a different local environment of these centers. Location in different parts of the thylakoid membrane might be involved. We also applied different error analysis procedures to determine the error ranges of the values found for the molecular rate constants. It is shown that the commonly used standard error has very little meaning, as it assumes independence of the fit parameters. Instead, an exhaustive search procedure, accounting for all possible correlations between the fit parameters, gives a more realistic view on the accuracy of the fit parameters